Author Archives: Sujanthan Anandakumar

AS-7725
Avatar

About Sujanthan Anandakumar

B. Sc. Software Engineering

Knowledge, another form of power

Knowledge, another form of power

There is enough information on the Internet, but it is sometimes unsuitable for scientific purposes because the sources do not meet the standards of science. It is for everyone advisable to continue one’s education. I sometimes get the feeling that people are living the ideology that if one put a little effort on one’s brain it can be spared, as it may sometimes be the case with everyday things. This does not apply to our most important organ; the opposite is the case!

I would like to quote an old Tamil proverb for the end:

கற்றது கையளவு
கல்லாதது உலகளவு.

Translated it means, what you know has the dimension of a fist, compared to what you do not know, it is as big as the entire world / the universe.

Or even shorter:
What you know is the size of a fist – what you do not know is as big as the world / the universe.

Conclusion:

Only knowledge can protect everyone from that, what is currently happening all over the world. Hope that when the purification procedure is over, it will never be needed again for a yuga, or these downgrades of yugas will no longer be the case – except for one’s own karma, it is always enduring. For information, we are in Kali Yuga after the Hindu age.

By-the-way (btw):
Wissenschaft [→ science] = Wissen erschaffen [→ create knowledge]
Wissenschaft [→ science] ≠ Wissen begraben [→ burying knowledge]

I will give you a few sources here, how and where you can possibly get free electronic books, etc., then gradually expand them without getting this post to the foreground each time.

The links to the free eBooks pages as well as the online sources can be only found in the future here:

The world’s oldest war weapon

The world’s oldest war weapon

[Last Update: 03rd August 2017]

The oldest war weapon in the world is as old as the mankind, but still effective and timeless.

Many of us imagine when they hear the word “war weapon” something technical, perhaps in our new era of B2B, something with B2B. How can it work with and without B2B and what are the consequences? I’ll try to explain the classical way without technical achievements, so anybody understand this can imagine what will it be if the attacks are combined (e. g. see my post “The Amygdala – part of the limbic system: do we really decide?”).

There is a very powerful weapon – the oldest war weapon – it is not of a physical nature, it is of psychological nature. The damages/manipulations are on a level, that the detection of the source(s) or backtracking cannot be done fast enough or is impossible. One of the reasons why detecting is so difficult is, that they try to not violate the causality e. g. using the given situation like hate between races, religions, families etc. and lot of manipulation are going through more than one generation. One should also notice that the source / injector can’t be classified as nations or something like that. Sometimes the manipulation can also take unwanted positive side effects. There is not only one psychological attack tactic because the less number of psychological attack tactics would lead the chances of success converging to zero.

Imagine the fundament for the EU (European Union) was given shortly after the second world war and not first in the end of the 80s. One of the reasons to build the EU is to be armed for such manipulation. The reason why this point of view is first shortly understandable is that even not all were inaugurated. The form of the EU like we have now is given since the 21st century. The situation we have now and can feel and notice is the absolute truth (see my definition absolute truth or The three manifolds of truth, or the three faces of truth) and bring politics, sciences, religions etc. in a new absolute view. In those days, the fitting of the parameters of a complex equation were not so easy like nowadays with classical computers or quantum computers. The equation of the world politics is so complex as the equation for the weather. Apropos weather, the research for manipulating the weather started even before the First World War e. g. injecting the clouds with silver iodide and the information that a weather can decide about victory or defeat was known since the mankind are waging wars. Nowadays we can feed a computer with different parameters and let it calculate the end process.  This is the reason why some manipulations had positive or unwanted side effects in those days without powerful computers.

How can one divide religions, peoples, ethnic groups, cultures, families, etc.? Since the technical achievements alone are not sufficient, perhaps not useful, because one could identify the source / injector* and thereby the damage will be compensated after a foreseeable time.

The causers / fire raisers conceal themselves behind religions, ethnicities, nations, although they are everywhere and with us. The tactics are even better when they sometimes play the firefighters after they have raised up the fire. The hatred / hate in everyone is the driving force that the injectors usually use. Once lit, it develops its own dynamics (momentum), which was so intended by the injectors. One can then decouple from the thing, because the own dynamics will do the rest and one do not run the risk of being detected.

To conceal everything more effectively, keep the primitive people primitive and let them play/consume/deal with primitive things. This is only a tactical deflection maneuver. I am counting here some of the things: whorehouses, alcohols, drugs, etc. Combine these with financial hardship (e.g. less payments) bad education etc. and one will get a better effect of concealing.

If one combine all these things the system, the people, the nations, etc., are thrown into a controlled chaos. This information is also pointed out in my article “The glassy man, a devil’s work?” In the sentence: “If one have ever thought about how tailback / jam occurs and how engineers try to disarm these then you ‘ll understand how one can use the same Know-how to get the opposite effect.”

How can chaos be controllable – is not a contradiction?

It is important to question the events correctly, objectively and with rational mind and not to drown in any conspiracy theories. This would be counterproductive since it is poison for the mind. It is also bad at the same time to doubt everything or to believe, one come into vicious circle. One must accept certain things as true – unless the contrary is proved. This is similar to the mathematical proof. If one begins to doubt everything even the basic axioms of the mathematics, the whole system collapses. Anyone who has been good in maths, e. g. reductio ad absurdum, mathematical induction etc., will understand what I’m trying to explain.

* injector = people who injects things in classical way or with technical achievements

Similar and additional posts

Further sources

Power, an instrument with two faces

Power, an instrument with two faces

[Last Update: 31st October 2018]

Power can be interpreted as an instrument for the common good or as an instrument for the preservation of egocentric fire in one respectively i.e. the ego which seeks to preserve its own interests.

[It can sometimes make sense to be clear about terminology before going into depth. Because terminology sometimes can create space for interpretations that the author may or may not want to have. The associations which is not intended by the author can cause damage. This is for general and not only for this post]

The word power can be interpreted in different ways. One can equate power e.g. with money and wealth, knowledge can be power or the combination of this and that. It becomes dangerous with power, if it is the combination or the union of many or all, that the interests of one or a limited number of people of this world should serve. Here the instrument “power” misses the welfare of all, that is, the common good.

An interesting example from the current time is e.g. the Brexit topic or the elections in the United States of America. I can take more recent examples from (world) politics, but we will limit to these two issues, not to lose the track.

Was and will the people be sufficiently informed about the consequences of their decision? I am well aware that the complexity of (world) politics cannot be summed up in a few sentences – for that reason, the parties choose topics or election promises that can sometimes be polarizing, with which they attract their voters, although the topics later in the real politics may only be one of many or only a side topic. Also, the fact that the voters’ sympathy for a politician or a particular party or the combinations of this can blind the voter without his or her noticing.

Of course, the politicians know this and make use of it. This usage can, as suggested in my headline, come from two motives: the common good, or it should only serve a handful of people.

If I had to properly discuss the two topics, I would not come around without exposing an individual or a small group of individuals behind it – above all, I do not want it if I feel that the individual is unaware about the consequences of its action (Brexit).

The fact of the Brexit issue is that British law does not require or be binding on the vote, as this would limit the sovereignty of the parliament, which, however, must be guaranteed under British law – in simple words, one do not have to implement the vote, the parliament can also ignore it.

[A German proverb says: Whoever says “A” must also say “B” – I say that this does not necessarily have to be. This should be an allusion to my chosen topics that I do not really want to deepen, not out of laziness, but primarily out of didactic reasons]

Further sources about Brexit

The glassy man, a devil’s work

The glassy man, a devil’s work?

[Last Update: 15th July 2017]

Most people are not aware that the profiling of a human being is very simple in our digital era. Although it is sometimes thought that the data is decentralized and are not associable, but there are ways to get access. Anyone who has been paying attention in math lectures knows the meaning of a transitive relation, which says that if a = b and b = c, the information a = c can be extracted without have been given explicit. I have chosen this example for better understanding. The instruments of data mining are much more complex, which of course can be misused for profiling and other damaging purposes.

The principle of chaos theory says that small changes in the starting parameters have a great impact on its result. If you want to kick a system into chaos, profiling is very helpful. As I mentioned in my article “Brain-To-Brain Interface,” people tend to use the data and new technologies almost first for destructive things rather than for meaningful things.

If one have ever thought about how tailback / jam occurs and how engineers try to disarm these then you ‘ll understand how one can use the same Know-how to get the opposite effect. For example, substitute the word jam with the word war in the previous sentence, then the same sentence get into a new informational dimension. If we pair this knowhow / information with the stupidity of some, then we have a powerful instrument such as terror. Looking at the terror of past decades, perhaps one has noticed that the mankind was not freed from this on any days. Is it a coincidence? Are there really different faces and names? The best arrangement is to make people to thing that they are willed at their own. I can easily fill a whole book only with topics like manipulation (techniques), see also my article: “The world’s oldest war weapon” or “The Amygdala – part of the limbic system: do we really decide?”.

It should also be clear for everyone that in my articles sentences (Wortspielerei [DE] = word gaming ? [EN]; I’m not sure what the right expression is for the German word “Wortspielerei” is in English) such as “When God enters the marriage with devil” have deep meanings. This sentence contains a lot of information in it, so one can easily fill several pages for the interpretation of it. It has primarily didactic reasons when I briefly summarize the texts.

Mathematics, only a language (Part 1)

Mathematics, only a language? (Part 1)

[Last update: 22nd July 2017]

There are mathematicians who would not want to see and accept mathematics as a language or a formal language. The reduction of mathematics to a formal language is important to understand the math behind the mathematics and perhaps to be able to internalize the underlying philosophy – especially for non-mathematicians.

Regardless of the point of view, mathematics is mostly used as a tool / instrument in natural sciences and other disciplines.

Sometimes the reality of mathematics is often deformed* by persons or group of interests, mostly with statistics and its related statements. This is not a fault of mathematics or intended by mathematics, it’s only the cognition or the suggestion intended by the initiator.

Back to our assumption: Mathematics is just a formal language! To understand this, one should internalize what is a formal language. A formal language is a construct over a given alphabet and production rules. One can also regard the rules of production as axioms or grammars. Attention, I’m using the terms here as synonyms, although they are well-defined and circumscribable – but as synonyms it’ll help you to understand it better!

Now back to mathematics. Mathematics also has well-defined signs and axioms. Based on this, the whole mathematics is built up. The axioms are non-contradictory. If they should contradict each other, then the whole mathematics would collapse like a house of cards.

Appeal to the linguistic genes who feel that they can’t do anything with mathematics. It is also just a language 😊.

Footnote

* This is not only the case in mathematics, it is also in many other disciplines too – from simple test reports to scientific reports. Here is a case that has lasted for almost a century:

This can have happened accidentally, but it has been swept under the carpet, so that one does not sit on the overproduction. Another example is the works of Shakespeare. What if the works are not from Shakespeare, everyone can make his or her own picture. There was even a good show. I think it was on ZDF (Das Shakespeare-Rätsel, Terra X, DE), but I’m not sure about it at this juncture. Please note: Just because I recommend a tv program or show, one should not conclude that all parts of this program must always fulfill the consensus of the truth. I have noticed in the last ten years that some TV shows or channels (no matter which channel or show), after I have classified it as good, are no longer good or only partial good. Coincidence? My criticism or statement here does not refer to the TV show: TerraX or the channel ZDF. Please do not misinterpret it, but – for current cause – this applies generally to all my links. All channels of the Germany’s public broadcasting are recommendable, regardless of whose hands they were or are still now (partially).

I have completely switched to the Germany‘s public broadcasting channels as I was a teenager. The quality of the content is unbeatable in those channels. The few channels, which I possibly look besides the public broadcasting channels, are sometimes the news channels.

Some of the elder generations still knows the difference of the first-row channels and the second-row channels, as well as day and week newspapers like FAZ or ZEIT, magazines like Spiegel or the Stern, at least the parent houses of my German friends knew that, how these channels, newspapers and magazines mentioned here were politically oriented – of course, it was not talked officially about that. The interests were associated with political parties. Maybe you can understand it better today that the association with political parties will not bring the absolute truth into the daylight. This dualism can also be found in foreign news channels, magazines, etc.

Because I overstrain the freedom granted by the definition for the footnote, I will proceed the continuation in the future under a separate heading.

Another example from everyday life. I’m buying already over several years a special cheese for my pizza and other dishes. I could see that the cheese was not as good as before. After optical examination, I could conclude that the color was lighter – this can only be attributed to the fact that the ripening process has not been properly observed. Whether they leave a product ripening for four weeks or ripening for only two weeks is reflected in the profits of the company. This is one of the way to increase the prices without the customer noticing this. To hell with them. There are some cheeses which are defined in the cheese regulation (Käseverordnung). The German Lebensmittelbuch (Food Book & Labelling) has a similar function, which is not necessarily legally binding.

It is important to know that many competing theories exist in science, which may even contradict one another. An example from the astrophysics of the beginnings of the last century is that one has thought that the universe is static. It has been proven that the universe is not static. It is expanding constantly and the universe has an end, in the sense of existing. The entire science, of course, build on each other. If a theory has been disproved, it has consequences for the whole theories which have been built from it.

If certain theories and things are the result of conscious or unconscious actions, that is not the subject here. My primary goal is to enlighten, not only the science.

The most important message at all – God given sign in the science of nature and other disciplines (cover or overlap the sign, so that people thing that the signs are coincidence or unnatural):