From Myths to TruthPart 8

[Enemy of the State]

Most people don’t know that the science of neural networks and artificial intelligence hasn’t existed for 20 or 30 years, but that the scientific foundations for it were laid back in the 1950s.

A hypothetical thought πŸ˜‡ how one can achieve a certain kind of entanglement despite respecting privacy, which cannot exist in the absolute, and more on that at some point later.

Imagine you want to realize that when you eat something, someone else finds out about it, automatically and not in the traditional way. For the sake of simplicity, let’s assume that sugary food is the trigger for this thought experiment. To do this, you need to know which areas of the brain are activated when we eat something like that. It is also the case that even the thought of eating something sweet can trigger similar effects, but that is another matter, I’m only mentioning it here for the sake of completeness.

You have to know that the brain does not correspond to simple binary logic, but that other mathematical concepts play a role here, namely a kind of blurring, which is not possible with binary logic or Boolean logic, where there is only black and white, i.e. ZERO and ONE, which does not occur in nature. The computer is also not absolute, the voltages corresponding to binary values ​​0 and 1 are defined by threshold, i.e. if the voltage falls below the defined threshold, then it is defined as zero, if the voltage exceeds the defined threshold, then it is defined as one.

The brain, however, even when the nervous system and many other things work with electricity, are not binary. What do I mean by that?

Imagine that there are terms in natural language that are not absolute, but rather relative or subjective, e.g. warm, cold, medium warm, etc. You cannot define absolute values ​​here, e.g. you speak of warm when the temperature is between 18Β° and 24Β°, or cold when it is below 15Β°.

If you want to depict such processes, you need a new type of logic and this is called fuzzy logic. This is the logic of uncertainty.

Our model-like brain consists only of synapses for easy understanding, which are simple nodes of the neural network.

It is also the case that I am writing this article (like any other) off the cuff and do not need to be scientifically complete, because that would go beyond the scope. It has also been a while since I have dealt intensively with such things in medicine.

Let’s assume further hypothetically that we can dock something wireless to certain synapses, we lovingly call these babies the Bynars – maybe even one of the Pancha Boothas, namely fireπŸ”₯.

It’s just that a small number of synapses is enough to find out whether someone has eaten something sugary or not, that’s also a kind of ankle bracelet πŸ€­πŸ˜‡.

Whether my babies dock directly to certain areas of the brain or to the human second brain, most people may not know that, which is the entire gastrointestinal tract, perhaps some will now understand why love can also go through the stomach or how gut feeling will be understood or other peripheries of the central nervous system (CNS), we will leave aside.

Now you can link logical operations to this, e.g. If person A eats chocolate, then give person B feedback or trigger thirst in person B. Welcome to the new world, or rather the new era has long since begun, you all just don’t know it πŸ˜‡.

Now you can create the entanglement between a subject and an object or several objects, which in turn can also be subjects, but they don’t have to be, and maybe we’ll run all this data through a kind of proxy to anonymize it, like one does with anonymized samples/tests, for example.

Do you know that for the scientific study of such non-entangled, but necessary for understanding, simple invertebrates such as leeches were used, whose entire neural system only consists of around 200,000 synapses? Of course, this is only an approximate value and depends on various other factors.

With such simple life forms, studies have been carried out on how this animal can be stimulated externally so that it moves in the desired direction.

Imagine all of this with humans, if you can manipulate people, i.e. stimulate them externally and even ensure that certain people buy iPhones, others Samsungs and yet others who knows what brand, don’t you think that many companies would pay money for something like that so that they can move up?

Who of you knows the novel “Brave New World” by Aldous Huxley, which is one of the world-class books? Apropos, it was compulsory reading for us and I have only read a handful of such readings or classic books 🀭, before I give the wrong impression.

I mostly only read or study specialist literature, many people won’t believe this, as a child I even liked reading manuals, for technical equipment πŸ˜‚, for example hi-fi systems, televisions, etc.

At the moment, reading is almost impossible for various reasons, but that’s a story in itself. Maybe I talk too much about (former) military secrets or state secrets 🀭.