From Myths to Truth – Part 2

Free will, delusion of nature?

As already mentioned in the first part, there are only two possibilities, which have been scientifically established in such a way that free will has two typical characteristics, namely random and determinism.

It is also true that these two characteristics contradict the actual free will. What actually suggests free will is random. Random gives the feeling of free will. This is what may suggest to certain people that absolute determinism, which is the closest thing to fate/destiny, does not exist. (There is a difference between the English terms fate and destiny, but for simplicity’s sake I use them as synonyms.)

This allows you to define a kind of degree of freedom and also justify the compensation of latencies. This only reinforces the model of fate. Anyone who has empirically investigated a lot of things in the last eight to ten years, because this possibility existed when the right shutters were open, would also understand that random is not really random after all, as even quantum physics proclaims, but that chance even reflects the divine will. 

Now we come to the mechanism, whoever understands this mechanism can also misuse it. 

Try to imagine the understanding of degrees of freedom as a mechanical engineer would, because this imagery provides a better understanding than thousands of words.

If you understand the randomness and determinism, then you can better understand MK-Ultra and many other things, including hypnosis.

Imagine that there are instruments like those of a gardener who tends the garden. There is a certain responsibility for humanity to do this. If such instruments fall into the wrong hands, much like a doctor’s scalpel falls into the hands of a murderer, then we will have more than chaos, namely catastrophes and even apocalypses.

I can provide you with some scientific papers on free will, but most people will not be interested in that because those who are interested will find it anyway.

I read the first article about the lack of free will about 22 years ago and was very excited because I had never seen such a way of thinking before. It was an article by Professor Dr. Dr. Dr. Gerhard Roth, who recently passed away. Yes, you must have counted correctly 😂, the number of doctorates.

The problem is that one has catapulted me into things that I never wanted to have anything to do with and that my mind is not designed for such things. I am also only half, without my heart, no false conclusions, by that I mean that I am more of a beast, which is also my actual dominant core.

I have also shown two lectures (video excerpts) by two different scientists in the past. There are also some scientific articles that I have read about this before. Let’s see if I can find all of it. Even despite order, it is always possible to not see the forest for the trees 😂. 

Further sources