From Myths to Truth – Part 12

Ghosts, madness or sense?

What is referred to as ghosts are primarily projections of the mind, usually your own mind or intellect, which in turn is a reflection of your entire central nervous system, i.e., how your brain is structured, how you have conditioned it, for example, through learning or not learning.

I have studied parapsychology, at least very superficially, and the content I have seen allows for several conclusions, so I will draw on my own experiences, my own empirical observations, namely those of the last 5 to 10 years.

Everything in this world is information, and what one may perceive as ghosts are so-called chunks, similar to what is defined in information technology or communications technology. For me, these are simply remnants of the deceased. The body and its decomposition process can be observed, but the other entities of an individual are difficult to access, especially when science has been castrated and much is officially kept secret. Then there is no reference point to which one can refer, but here I can only refer to my empirical data and conclusions as the main feature.

The question is, when I play a movie on Blu-ray, is the information part of this universe, i.e., the 3+1-dimensional space-time construct, or does space have even more dimensions, i.e., real dimensions, which I deny through my visions or cosmic impressions. Of course, many here would find this question pointless or ridiculous; the same is true when one interprets the mathematics of physics in such a way that such aspects arise in science, e.g., string theory.

A programming language is also a specific arrangement of information; it is ultimately just information, just as a program itself is just a specific arrangement of information, which is why it appears dynamic. Simple information, like books or magazines, is static, but programs are dynamic, much like a car that can move. A lot can happen here, namely, that a kind of invisible VR headset or one the size of an eye lens, and several of these simultaneously, one after the other, interfere with the visual⁰ nervous system and periphery. Here, according to my observations, race conditions sometimes occur, a phenomenon known from operating systems, more precisely, the parallelization of processes, which then leads to a kind of blurriness in the visual, and therefore also in the real world. Imagine there are many people interfering with the steering wheel at the same time. This is the focus area, which, for example, affects the muscles of the iris, which can then no longer adjust the focus, and therefore the visual aspect becomes blurred. At least, this is my belief, based on empirical data.

Of course, there are many ways to explain why one’s vision is blurred in old age or even in young years. It can be due to high blood pressure, many other metabolic problems, infections, etc., and of course also cataracts, all the way up to the classic phenomena that require glasses.

There is also the question of whether one wants to live with nature or live against nature (33 vs. 34, where 33≠33)¹, an important aspect of transience, but not like that of capitalism; that also applies to everything else in this chain, e.g., artificial wear and tear.

It is the question of whether a certain interaction exists. In physics, four different forces are defined that lead to this interaction, and the most commonly used is electromagnetism; the rest are the weak and strong forces, as well as gravity.

Another problem is that of referencing, i.e., different reference systems that collide, thus suddenly merging. For example, we know the term “skew” from linear algebra, which states that two straight lines do not intersect or touch and are also not parallel. Skew constructs exist not only in three-dimensional mathematical constructs, but also in higher mathematical constructs that have nothing to do with the physical, i.e., spatial dimension and are simply pure mathematical constructs.

One can also imagine this visually: imagine two bridges in space that are not touching or are parallel, and suddenly one bridge falls onto the other.

Mathematical constructs are only about information that suddenly coincides. Again, I don’t want to restrict it here, because words and definitions are limitations, which suddenly puts constraints on the whole thing, which shouldn’t happen. Remember that science is only about models, so one tries to derive the original from shadows, which is never possible because information is missing. These cannot be picked up elsewhere, as they are assumptions.

I tried to explain to my baby, my daughter, that science is also a creed, especially mathematics, in a somewhat casual way to draw attention to the dangers. All sciences use mathematics as their instrument.

According to my current knowledge – I must also emphasize² – I have not studied the history of mathematics as a science in depth, but I am passionate about mathematics. One could say it was my first love. Mathematics was formalized independently by at least two mathematicians with: set theory, and the Peano axioms.

When we talk about Peano axioms in mathematics, we are referring to all assumptions that are consistent with each other. What are assumptions? Assumptions are nothing other than beliefs, thus the basis of mathematics is a statement of faith. This was also the reason why, a few centuries ago, mathematics suddenly fluctuated so much that it almost collapsed, namely with the Barber’s Paradox or Russellian Autonomy.

All the constructs from different cultures, especially aspects classified by occultism, such as black magic and voodoo, have a real connection, despite the many objections from various sciences.

This doesn’t mean that everything is true; there are far too many charlatans, but the arrogance of science shouldn’t ignore them or bury them for other societal reasons, such as fear. According to my observations, this has similar elements to what has already been demonstrated in quantum mechanics at the quantum level, and the Nobel Prize awarded to Anton Zeilinger a few years ago also has an effect on the macroscopic level, even if this is officially denied. Mr. Zeilinger received the prize for the quantum level, just so that it is not confused here. This, and much of what is written in my publications, whether on the website or elsewhere, are my own conclusions and theses.

A lot of it can be traced back to empiricism, as well as logical thinking, recognizing contradictions, and many other aspects.

Footnote

⁰ Please don’t draw any false conclusions here. The extent to which one can see into the field of vision is not comparable to the normal human field of vision. Other instruments are used here, also to provide a kind of supplement. Physics, especially quantum physics, postulates the uncertainty principle. Officially, it means that momentum and particles cannot be determined with equal precision and, in a divine sense, it also forms a data protection guideline that cannot be circumvented, similar to GPS or the encryption methods on Blu-ray players, where the key or the encryption has not actually been cracked, but certain correlations have been identified and this has been circumvented using a bypass, so to speak. Almost 20 years ago, however, I also understood it in a metaphorical sense, i.e. also in the social sense; that is human psychology. It is simply the case that if you observe a child and the child knows that it is being observed, its actions will also be different. This is also why the police, for example, often drive past critical locations in order to be able to bring about change. Of course, this will never be absolute.

There are also methods, as I use in Tamil, namely: “கதை விட்டு கதை கேட்பது.” This is also used in police and/or military interrogations and has different names, which are also different techniques:

• Reid Technique
• PEACE Model
• Cognitive Interviewing Technique
• Behavioural Analysis Interviewing

All of these methods, and many more, are designed to effectively gather information while respecting the rights and dignity of the interviewees. Then there are also complementary methods that are unofficial, such as secret armies or other connections to syndicates and networks.

Imagine a scenario where the data is accessible even outside of Earth…

¹ Not a contradiction, if you understand it, it is similar to dividing by zero when considering limits in mathematics, or more precisely in analysis.

² I was never concerned with being right. Rather, this website, or any conversation in its various forms, should actually serve, like many other things I do, to find people with whom I can interact, that is, share my knowledge, and engage with them critically and respectfully without losing my dignity, but that seems to be a scarce commodity in humanity.

My provocations also serve to stimulate humanity, or people, or the reader, to reflect. Sometimes my words are shaped like the cut made by a surgeon with a scalpel. This is also an instrument of rhetoric, or my rhetoric.