Cosmos is alive and not dynamic and lifeless
When I use examples from computer science or many theories in physics/quantum physics and many other scientific domains that may attempt to describe consciousness, I get the feeling that many people have the wrong picture of the whole, namely that the cosmos is a kind of machine. The human body is also called a machine (இயந்திரம்/எந்திரம் → Enthiram) in Tamil, at least this is used in some Hindu texts, I think also that was the case in the Gita. You have to understand what the word machine actually suggests, namely first and foremost a certain degree of determinism, e.g. cigarette machines are deterministic, this is a topic in the basic course of computer science, how automata work, for example.
Only because I use technical terms that humanity only came to understand in lifeless matter and even in the western hemisphere there is a kind of blindness when it comes to defining materials, because chemistry also has certain definitions between dead matter and living matter etc.
I have been able to observe and perceive a lot of things in recent years, which then convinced me a lot and or I didn’t know how to sort it all out or understand it. There is also a song by Xavier Naidoo that sums it up, namely “Alles Lebt [→ Everything is alive]” or you won’t believe it, similar to the Disney film “Beauty and the Beast“.
Just for your information, I don’t know to what extent who/what has already experienced everything that is constantly being passed on in circles, not only that, but new groups are gradually joining in, so don’t draw the wrong conclusions, I haven’t taken drugs and I don’t take drugs either, maybe a little alcohol, that’s only for medical purposes, i.e. digestion 🤭.
Why I mention this, but phrase it a bit funny, is to remember that your thoughts are also actions, just as your non-thoughts are also an action, similar to how the empty set is also a subset of every set.
It’s not just that it’s mentioned here, but that’s how it’s presented in Hinduism. There are two major movements in Hinduism, Vedanta and Samkhya, although I couldn’t delve into the kind of philosophical works that I would have if I had studied philosophy because I couldn’t find a teacher or people who were passionate about it, and I even wanted to learn and understand Sanskrit, so I can’t categorize it that way, but I was able to teach myself a lot from the context of the Vaishnava tradition. Of course, there are many ways to teach all of this nowadays, e.g. via YouTube, which wasn’t the case when I was spiritually blossoming and only played a major role in my autodidactic progress in the later phase. Now it’s too late for a lot of things or more preciously not more needed because the entire library is inside me 😇, as Hinduism also says, you just have to find the access 🤭, regardless of the fact that I don’t…
There’s a difference between reading all of that or having read it like I did and perhaps not having understood it, but then suddenly experiencing/perceiving everything and no longer knowing how to sort out this perception, especially all of that overstimulated my senses, as I have already described figuratively with the blind man who begins to see for the first time. It’s just that no one is currently able to talk openly about it because there are different construction sites or legacy issues everywhere.
I experienced all of that in the first phase, which was before 2012 à la Enemy of the State 🤭, but even then, not everyone was willing to talk, even though I did.
My hypothesis is that due to the different latencies, people are not aware of many things, and perhaps other things cannot be conscious of them, even if they are conscious. Can you follow me? In abstract terms, how do you think a snail perceives time if it could do something like that, which humans or science cannot rule out? It certainly has a completely different time lapse, similar to the frame rate in a video, than humans, right?
I have read that intoxicated people, i.e. those who take drugs, also have different time lapses, i.e. perception of time. This is also shown in films, as if their consciousness receives and processes more information in the same period of time. I know that the brain has a natural filter that protects against overstimulation, for example if you live on a busy street, at some point you no longer notice these background noises, it is a natural filtering mechanism of the brain, also a kind of shutter-function or firewall.
It is also, what is perception here, how is it to be understood, are there other sense organs than the 5 (+4) senses defined in science?
Is it possible that certain perceptions can be activated somehow, as if by an (invisible) switch? Some things also reminded me of one of my first posts, namely the transcendent of the number 3, where Hinduism defines three levels or states, namely:
- அரூபம் (Transliteration: Aruhpam),
- அருவுருவம் (Transliteration: Aruvuruvam) and
- உருவம் (Transliteration: Uruvam)
Some things in physics, namely dark matter or dark energy, or the interactions, although I had a different explanation for the first two, that’s another matter, but in order to better understand the sensory perception, you have to understand what an interaction is in physics.
Most of the time physics is only about one interaction, namely electromagnetism, and the 5+4 can also be traced back to that, because the sense of sight, what happens here is that the visible light, which is actually electromagnetism, i.e. a certain frequency spectrum, is converted into electrical signals, which is also electromagnetism, i.e. electricity. This is transmitted via the optic nerves to the visual cortex in the back of the head.
It’s similar with everything else, e.g. the sense of smell, here the chemical substances are converted into electrical impulses and in turn are transmitted electrically, as if via a kind of data line, which are the nerves or the entire CNS, to the relevant area of the brain. It is no different with the sense of hearing. There, the acoustic stimuli are converted into electrical impulses by the fine hairs and membrane in the ear, perhaps similar to a record, and then transmitted electrochemically; actually, all stimuli are transmitted electrochemically.
How can you imagine the interaction in abstract terms, what does interaction mean? In layman’s terms or in a visual representation, an interaction is like when two billiard balls hit each other. What happens when two billiard balls hit each other? They learn about each other, or if they had consciousness. This is only explained in layman’s terms or as a model, so that you understand what an interaction is, because otherwise the physicists might have a fit of rage 🤭.
For human perception, and perhaps even sufficient for survival, it is clear that when two billiard balls collide, these two objects interact. However, in the quantum world this is not the case. There, there is the phenomenon of wave-particle duality and there are mediating particles that exchange the message or the forces. In electromagnetism, these are photons.