Category Archives: Science

Order: Part 4

Order: Part 4

It is perhaps not known to the general public that there is a clear image for something abstract in mathematics, namely the visualization of the probability space.

If one put a chimpanzee in front of a typewriter and give the chimpanzee enough time, paper, ink, etc., it is possible that the chimpanzee will one day type out the entire Bible without making any mistakes.

This possibility exists in this universe. This is called the possibility space. With this I want to reinforce my previous statement that you can only invent something that is also an element of the possibility space, without analysing again the German word “erfinden“, i.e. “to invent” etymologically.

So, if a chimpanzee can even type the Bible correctly, isn’t it the arrogance of humans that they put themselves on a pedestal?

You also have to understand chance correctly, not necessarily as quantum mechanics postulated or the interpretation of it, but in all contexts or the true nature, i.e. without castrating anything.

Apparently, it was, at least that is the official statement 😉, I had other impressions, but that is another matter, to unite quantum mechanics with the theory of relativity and create an all-encompassing super theory, that is TOE (Theory of Everything). There are many different approaches to trying to make this happen, including quantum gravity. 

I presented this for the first time on my website about 18 years ago or so, which then led to some professors (Uni HD, HHN …) degrading fellow students, but that is an old story.

Actually, it was not this that fueled their arrogance, but the fact that I criticized string theory or saw it as more suitable for science fiction films and not as a model of reality, at least the general interpretation. I considered the idea that space could be rolled up like strings to be unrealistic, but I did not expect that people of this calibre might be interested in my lecture. It was more of a desperate attempt on my part to find like-minded people, but not necessarily to generate hostility.

I also did not expect that professors or others in this country would have the upper hand, because this was not known in my mind at the time.

In the meantime, I had impressions/visions about the reality of physics, i.e. about the model of the world, where the 3+1 (=4) dimension, known in science as space-time, is not sufficient to describe many phenomena, such as gut feeling, remote viewing (RV) and many other phenomena, but there are additional dimensions or entities that exist on each of the four axes and twice, i.e. MahaKala and MahaKali.

By the way, if you are interested in the sets above the complex numbers, here is the resolution of the hierarchy: Quaternion, Octonion, Sedenion

All of these have several imaginary axes. These also play a role in string theory or 3D games, (3D) simulations up to my mentions, such as: RV, consciousness etc.

Order: Part 3

Order: Part 3

Remember that a car looks like a car and does not collapse into a lump of metal, iron, plastic, rubber…etc., has to do with a natural memory of matter.

How do you shape iron? You heat it up and the old memory is destroyed, you shape it again and let it cool down systematically, i.e. you program a new memory for the object.

There are also systems or metals, they even say intelligent metals or shape memory alloys, which, when they are the body of a car, return to their original shape after an accident with a hot air gun, I read about it in a specialist journal in the late 90s, in case anyone thinks that this has only been around for a few years now, where the growth resembles Eulerian form and is getting faster and faster…

Did you think in the 80s that talking cars could ever exist, like Knight Rider or Herbie (VW Beetle, since the 60s, so 1963) 😉? How does the present feel?

Has the imaginary axis projected its seed onto the real axis? Do you know what complex numbers are? These numbers are unsorted and lie in a plane, not like all the other numbers before them, e.g. real numbers, rational numbers, … up to the natural numbers, then we also have the extravagant numbers that are called transcendental, such as pi, Euler’s number, etc.

It is also arrogant of people to say: “The good Lord made the whole numbers, everything else is man’s work.” If that were the case, how are fractals or quantum mechanics to be understood 😉? Does God have no idea about this advanced mathematics 😉?

Speaking of which, there are of course numbers above the complex numbers, these are necessary in computer science and in many other engineering disciplines, or generally in the STEM subjects, whether it is quantum mechanics or 3D games etc., are not possible without these constructs.

Also, do not forget that in a cosmos only things that are already there can exist, even if people in their arrogance think they are inventing something, even in the German word “erfinden”, that means “to invent” there is the medicine in the German term to break the arrogance, namely German term “erfinden” consist the term “finden” that means to find, so one can only invent things if they are part of the cosmos, i.e. are there in a form [not in context to have a form], right? Can you find something that is not there? No, can you?

Everything in this world is just a variation / permutation etc., including your thoughts. Everything has limitslimited edition, including information. You can never imagine that if this cosmos splits off and something completely different emerges, where the WHERE cannot be understood.

One more thing: It may be that the “natural numbers” are infinite and so are the “real numbers”, but the real numbers are overpowering. In mathematics, we talk about uncountability, which means much more powerful. All of these number systems that you can ever invent are part of this cosmos, but never…

Pre-Zero Age – Free Will

Pre-Zero Age – Free Will

Who hasn’t experienced that in the first few hours of biology class, when you start dissecting animals and/or conducting experiments, such as moving the frog’s leg of a dead frog using electrical impulses. Most of the time, such experiments are shown as video documentation, at least that’s how it was with us.

It would also be cruelty to animals if everyone started dissecting animals in order to learn from them, but that’s another topic or a topic in itself.

If this is the case, and we know about the different Brodmann areas of the brain and many other peripheral systems of the nervous system or CNS (central nervous system), is it possible to stimulate these areas remotely, i.e. without using cables?

Perhaps it is already like this in nature and people create an illusion out of their ignorance that they are free? How can instincts, gut feelings, for example, be explained? A child dies in an accident and the mother/father sense that something has happened to their child.

Imagine if the secret services/military had secretly researched all of this and had been conducting field tests on their own people for decades or centuries?

Would you agree with that or would you say: “Yes, let them do it”.

Maybe also: Give us a few good deals at Lidl/ALDI/VW… and we’ll be happy.

Anyone who denies all of this has no idea about history and politics, right?

Can science be something absolute? Or is it a kind of modern religion?

Of course, science can never be absolute, that would be an internal contradiction. Science can only depict models of reality. It can only falsify and not verify, e.g. if a hypothesis is put forward that all ravens are black, it cannot verify this, but can only falsify if it is not so. 

Who knows the CIA’s MK-Ultra program?

Who knows the CIA’s MK-Ultra program?

It has many names, such as Borgs, is also symbolically represented with a cube or the monkey team, etc.

What do scientists say about free will? Do opinions differ here, perhaps there should be democratic voting in science? Is science really free, in the social sense? How are universities financed, is there a dependency?

What is perception? 😇🕕

Order: Part 2

Order: Part 2

To be in order for everything and to be remain in order, matter must also have a kind of memory, although it may be that geometric structures automatically give a form, but this is also information.

If this were the case, then we would look different every time, right? Or do we somehow do this? Is it possible that humans are constantly changing on a small scale? Actually, matter is constantly changing because nothing in the cosmos is at rest, except perhaps when the temperature converges to 0 Kelvin.

What does the term “photogenic” describe in this context? Humans are what they have consumed over the years as food, oxygen, through their skin, etc., right? That means that what was previously something else was assimilated into this? Some would say that food was converted into energy, but is that really the case?

Is energy the same as energy? Of course, there are different forms of energy, such as potential energy, kinetic energy, chemical energy, electrical energy … 

While we’re already philosophizing, does free will exist?