Category Archives: Science

If Shiva is God, why did he not save his wife Sati?

If Shiva is God, why did he not save his wife Sati?

Many people ask, if Shiva is God, i.e. the Almighty, then why could he not save his own wife, that is Sati or Adi-Shakti, let alone revive her.

Do you know the answer?

You all have a wrong image of God, perhaps that is why you or certain religions consider images or names to be sinful.

You think God has to come running when it suits you, then he should just go away when it doesn’t suit you, right? Have you ever experienced children or yourself sometimes sending your parents away, you don’t want your parents around, for example when you’re with friends, right?

Of course, until everything goes wrong, then the parents are supposed to suddenly come running? Of course, only if the ego allows it 🤭.

The answer lies behind your question and this counter-question. There are also people who want to find the answers themselves and not have everything dictated to them. Do you know how different people can be?

You are independent of everything as a collective, that can be a nation, religion, society, company, etc., but aren’t you yourselves responsible for the preservation of this world, right?

This is where the interesting part begins, namely the interplay between illusion and non-illusion, which in turn is also an illusion, because as science has already established, determinism and chance or chaos go hand in hand, with chaos being just the hidden variant of determinism.

Apropos chaos, who is actually chaotic, the female or the male?

A completely different question: Is gas or solid matter chaotic in its movement? What is female (attribute) here and what is male (attribute) here, when Hinduism postulates that Purusha, i.e. consciousness/software is the male aspect and Prakriti, that is matter, is the female1 aspect.

What construct of nature does need a vessel to prevent from melting or leaking? It is the liquid or the gaseous, right? The solid or matter is normally already in a solid state. Warning: The definition of matter in science also includes gases and all sorts of things, including those that exist in other states. I am only trying to create clear images here to be able to explain it better, because the imagery is usually easier to understand.

In science, one talks about baryonic matter, that is the form of matter that is familiar to humans, that is what humans themselves insist on.

Do you see how everything in the world is cross-inherited? Can you recognize patterns? Another abstraction, isn’t it the case that the mother can be clear, but the father not 🤭? The mother is primarily clearly recognizable because she gives birth to the child, but who planted the seed is initially obscured, right? You can’t see the air directly, but you can see the solid matter, right?

The cosmic father is in its non-manifested form, fleeting, i.e. intangible, like software, whereas Prakriti, which is the matter, is tangible, i.e. also in the classical sense. Look at the human sex and how heredity works there. The female sex is physically weaker on average, but mentally stronger, whereas the male sex of this species, or in most cases of the species, is physically dominant, but mentally somewhat handicapped, right 🤭? One more thing, doctors say that the pain of childbirth is one of the worst pains, where most men would collapse.

Can you make a strict separation? Is it always the case that a girl resembles the father and the son resembles the mother? You can’t make strict separations, can you?

There are men who are very sensitive, then there are women who are very rough and all of this on different levels, it can be emotion, motor skills or walking style, voice, external features, gestures, facial expressions etc., right? As I already mentioned in another post, men, just like women, have testosterone as well as oestrogen.

Back to my original question, why did Shiva not revive his wife after she immolated herself, or even in the incarnation as Sita (Ramayana), where she is pressured by society to undergo an ordeal by fire?

Isn’t it the case that this creates constructs that are not in harmony with nature, that is, that create contradictions? For example, undoing something that has happened is comparable to raping someone and then undoing it. Doesn’t that change the course of things? Does anyone know the thought experiments such as the grandfather paradox, the twin paradox, etc.

Why is it forbidden?

Something else about latencies or limits, because latencies are the result of limits, e.g. the speed of light. Why is this necessary from a divine/cosmic perspective, for example?

Imagine if God took form and became angry, like after the death of Sati, what would have happened to this world immediately? Wouldn’t all the efforts of many others have been ruined? Isn’t it the case that fair and unfair go hand in hand, like equality and inequality?

Imagine that, as I have received it from the cosmos, this world has been created 84 times from a kind of boot loop (Microsoft Windows Blue Screen) and this is the 85th time. How much effort, time and energy do you think has already gone into this? What does science say about how old this cosmos is? Science is not absolute, but only a model, just as a shadow is also only a model of the real object or subject.

According to science, the universe is about 13.81 billion years old and this solar system is about 4.5 billion years old.

Does it mean that when God gets angry, it will have no effect or impact? If you believe that, aren’t you a little crazy? Maybe even like the father who lost his mind after the death of Sati. All of this and much more is called Dosha, translated it means error, in modern translation it means “error in the matrix“.

Last but not least, to the original question or…:

This time I know that everything will be different, as has already been prophesied in various religions, namely “day of reckoning (for humanity)”. It will be decided what will happen to people or to humanity, more precisely it has already been decided for humanity, what follows is for people, their lines and so on.

In Hinduism, people speak of incarnation or avatars, even in normal people, but especially in certain people, who are usually enlightened ones, who are supposed to lead humanity from darkness into light and if all of that is not enough and chaos or disorder still prevails or increases, then the entirety of God will also become flesh, perhaps in a dualistic form, Shiva and Shakti.

Everything was once the pearls of God, but because of the chaos or impurity, a lot of things went down the drain, that is the sewer system. There is a difference between a pearl falling into a sewer system, because pearls do not absorb all of that dirt, at least not all of that, and one can simply hold them in running water so that they will be clean again, or the pearl has absorbed everything into itself, like a sponge. 

The mind in general, the consciousness, is like a sponge, it absorbs a lot very quickly, which is why you should pay attention to what you look at, what you listen to, etc.

The consciousness must be shaped so that it is immune to the impurities that can be found in every corner of the capitalist world, until they are all finally eliminated.

If you ask a child: “Do you want ten bars of chocolate or just one?” The answer will usually be ten. Most children will eat it all or the expiration date will mean that it is no longer edible, that’s how people are, they don’t know what is good or bad, neither for themselves nor for the collective. In philosophy there are different aspects of what is good or bad, e.g. if the individual is doing well, then the collective will be doing well, or if the collective is doing well, then that has an effect on the individual. That’s how capitalism is, it doesn’t give a damn about who is doing well, it only strives for one thing, that is to get everything out of the way.

This is also why there is absolute asymmetry, because everything is determined by God, but for those who don’t like that, it is simply hidden, just like all knowledge is hidden in one. There are children who want to choose who they want to marry. Isn’t that an illusion?

I mean, just look at the world, how many of the people regret their decisions, and that includes not making a decision, because that is also a decision. Look at the product of all these failed relationships or marriages.

All these murderers, rapists, crooks, whether male or female, because there are also many sadistic or psychopathic women, but that just doesn’t get noticed, were all children once, the product of their parents’ wishes, right? Look at what will become of all these children that have been born in the last few years or are about to be born. The seed is planted quickly, but allowing it to grow and maintain it or even making the decision to remove what has gone bad is difficult and time-consuming, isn’t it?

Why does the state reward citizens with child benefit, for example? It’s not that it’s necessarily well-intentioned, but there has to be successors to finance and maintain the state, right? Or does anyone believe that the state is altruistic? Do you know what altruism means?

What if humanity has to be brought to a standstill? What needs to be changed? Have you already thought about how the state or other bodies will then accomplish this?

Isn’t it the case that when a constitutional state implements things like secret armies, that this is also used somewhere to do things that one would never expect from a constitutional state, such as killing people, even outside of a war and even in one’s own country? Does anyone think that this is a conspiracy theory? Isn’t it the case that a gardener decides which plant can grow where and what shape it can take? What tools does a gardener use for this? What if he wants to have more plants, what does he do then?

Are there perhaps (divine) instruments, like those of the gardener, to shape the entire world?

One more thing about secret armies, these will most likely be part of secret services, also covertly of course. In Germany there is a legal possibility for secret services to set up and operate covertly. There are also control bodies that have certain powers to inspect, but the reality seems to be different.

In my opinion, with secret armies there should be no direct correlation with the state; if someone is discovered or is being watched, no connection with the state is established. The problem is when someone or certain collectives, which are called secret orders, for example, set certain things in motion for their own private pleasure or their own interests. As already mentioned, secret armies or individual members of these troops, which can also be called mercenaries, are comparable to a gardener. All of this is practiced everywhere. It is also part of capitalism. If cloning is not allowed in Germany, then one goes to a country where it is not forbidden, right? If someone thinks they are paying too much tax in Germany, they emigrate to Arabia and continue to trade anyway. It is the same people and/or the same groups, and all of this has to be coordinated. When one group starts, the other says, if we don’t do something similar, we will perish, so we have no choice, right?

Does anyone know the history of cocaine, especially how it took hold in its current form? It may be that cocaine was originally developed as a drug by a German pharmacist (Albert Niemann), but it came back to Germany in this form through the Allies. It is also interesting that the Hells Angels were former soldiers of the US armed forces. Isn’t that the case when someone is well-disposed towards certain people, they are also disconnected and do a lot for the state? Or is this a manoeuvre by the secret services, because judges, politicians, CEOs, doctors and so on are also just ordinary people? Don’t you think that all these people don’t take cocaine or aren’t customers of the red-light district? Do all these people have their own pimps or suppliers? Or does anyone believe that many people who were drug addicts will stop at some point when they all reach high positions? How many police officers go to prostitutes? How many of the officers also have affairs? Doesn’t the state become fragile because of modern education? Or do you think that only a small fraction behaves badly?

If people in a constitutional state can be manipulated, for example through their everyday sins, can a constitutional state still function if the sins are not legally liable directly and without latency?

Imagine there are communication channels 💀😇 that go straight to the head, where no proof of blackmail is possible, at least not with the classic means of a state… I mean, if I blackmail or put pressure on someone by email, letter or phone call, then there are some traces, even if someone uses a proxy, i.e. blurs the traces for tracing.

Can’t one turn someone into a puppet on the classic level, regardless of constructs like MK-Ultra? I mean, someone who can be manipulated is the favourite of the puppet masters (of a state) until they no longer need this puppet, then the only question is, should the matter or the sin be revealed, i.e. should the person be damaged, or has this person already damaged themselves so that it is no longer necessary, in other words does not pose a danger?

Don’t you think that if a society creates constructs, personalities and roles, such as red-light districts, pimps, clients, prostitutes, that this becomes poison for a society, nation, etc.? Do you think that if children are born there, that is a blessing for the child? I have also heard some prostitutes say that if there were no prostitution, many men would become monsters. The problem is that none of you have understood why men or women become monsters. If you take away all these instruments, how stable do you think capitalism will remain?

Perhaps whatever is left for humanity will be enough for the next few decades, right? Then everything has to be systematically shut down, because what kind of grade do you expect when you study for your high school exams in the high-school exam? What is the point if you have studied hard, have not solved all the tasks in the exam period, but shortly after the exam everything becomes clear to you.

Please remember that miracles have to be earned and I know that you, as a unit, that is humanity, do not deserve it.

It is not without reason that I have started to reveal my true identity, so that everyone knows who the person is, who is watching everything here. Don’t you think that many people would have sinned less if they knew that they were being watched or that God existed?

While we are on this topic, how can you destroy faith in God? Perhaps by helping such dignitaries to sin? You can do the same with your own family, right? How can you destroy a family? There are many roads that lead to Rome, or should I say, lead to YELLOW ☀🐒🎲🚀🛸👾🤭?

Where did the former kings go, have you ever thought about it? Are they now called: Mercedes Benz, Porsche, Bayer, BASF and so on? Do secret services have customers, i.e. which clientele do they support? Can a secret service have several representatives/customers? Most people would say that the state or the government decides on this, but what is the state? What are lobbyists in this context?

How do one get other people’s money? Sex, drugs and rock and roll? Or does anyone think that secret services would never do something so dubious, especially not to their own people?

Look at the history of secret services, everything that has been done, whether in Cuba, Iran, Mexico and many other regions. It has been proven that the secret services are behind it. A lot of things only come to light after the dust has blown over, right?

Footnote

1 So that confusion takes over or understanding arises, the ‘escape’ is again feminine, and so is the SW or consciousness. The divine is inseparable, like the expression of true love, similar to what is expressed in the Tamil song “Oṉṟāṉavaṉ, uruvil iraṇṭāṉavaṉ“, which translates as: “You are one, but taking form you are dual” from the devotional film “Thiruvilaiyadal“.

True love knows no duality. You are one. When does new life emerge 🤭? Only when you become one, even if this happens with 💔violence🔥☠️.

Speaking of which, when do we speak of duelling?

Modern vs. Conservative – Part 2

Modern vs. Conservative – Part 2

Conservative [Shiva] vs. Modern (Adi-Shakti)

What conservative means is that it does not change, like the mathematical equal sign “=“, whereas modernity represents or describes a change, in other words in the mathematical sense the inequality ““. If something changes, then it can no longer be the same, right?

One more thing about mathematics and brackets. There is a difference between square and round brackets, for example in the notation of sets, or more precisely in intervals, not only that one has a masculine facet and the other a feminine facet. One should also not forget that men also have feminine aspects, whether physical (DNA, hormones, …), mind, emotions and so on, just as women have masculine aspects, and everything in nature is made up of these two aspects.

It may be that there are life forms, like a snail, where there is no gender, which does not mean that it has one or the other, but it will also have both, since these are inseparable even down to the subatomic level and below.

Physicists know that matter is also just a kind of appearance, while Hindus say that the world is afflicted by Maya, i.e. illusion or projection. Quantum physics describes matter up to a limit where no clear lines can be seen, is it solid or is it just vibration? The reason1 why quantum physics sees everything as quantized or defined in packets is only because everything has a causal connection between these lines, at least according to modern science. It is even the case, and perhaps not many people know this, that below this Planck scale or limits, which can be the Planck line or the Planck time, which are the Planck units, the world can be completely crazy, i.e. the laws of physics can be broken, such as those of thermodynamics, in other words perpetuum mobile would be possible 🙈🪔🤭.

According to my cosmic view, this is what modern science proclaims as physical laws, namely a special type of manifestation of the Mayan force, that is the power of Adi-Shakti. These laws are constant, like a diamond, that is the male aspect, and therefore cannot be changed. In order for there to be stability in the world, certain things have to be constant, right? Can a world exist if all forces are constantly changing? Would solid matter be possible?

Last but not least: Many people may know the word “Maya” in the context of the Mayan culture, which is the culture or civilization in South America. Do you now know what coincidence is? I don’t want to say that this must have been the case, that it was a coincidence, that the term Maya just happens to describe a civilization in South America, but it is a standard vocabulary of Hinduism.

According to some modern scientific explanations, there are indications, and there were at the time too, that all of these cultures are of Indian origin. For me, as a layperson in the field of archaeology, the temple architecture, for example, seems similar to the Hindu temples, at least on the first level of pattern recognition.

I have even been able to extract or sense something in recent years that the airplane or spaceship described in Ramayana was found somewhere in South America and/or in the southern part of North America decades or even centuries ago in the deep mountains of America. I also have the cosmic view that there were even androids that were found dismantled or not fully functional somewhere in the mountains on the American continent about 200 years ago.

Footnote

1 This is a very simplified statement. There are observations in physics that confirm this quantized phenomenon rather than the continuous course, which, for example, analogue technology suggests, in contrast to digital technology.

Addendum to Entropy

Addendum to Entropy

Reference: From Myths to Truth – Part 10

Urknall, Weltall und das Leben – Mysterium Entropie: das Rätsel der Physik (Harald Lesch & Axel Kleidon) [22.12.2024]
EN: Urknall, Weltall und das Leben – Mystery of Entropy: the Riddle of Physics (Harald Lesch & Axel Kleidon)

It is interesting that the cold has the highest entropy compared to heat, which can actually be taken from the definition of thermodynamics. It also occurs to me that, for example, the exhaust turbocharger is designed in such a way that it needs an intercooler because the cold air0 has a higher density of air molecules per volume and thus a higher level of efficiency can be achieved.

I am also slowly beginning to understand that entropy can of course also be understood as information, as I wanted it to be, in the context of data, and this in a way of coding. One just has to know or understand how the coding mechanism1 works and I also mentioned somewhere that Akasha can be seen as a kind of data storage of the cosmos and Akasha is part of space or the building block that space is made of. I also had a kind of mission where I perceived space as a kind of building block.

This amount of information can perhaps be interpreted in such a way, or there is a certain correlation, that the colder it is, the more information can be stored and the warmer it is, the less, because all the molecules are dancing, dancing violently, and need space around them. I have so many impressions, I don’t know how to formulate it all to get a holistic picture, but in such a way that no contradictions arise.

2024-12-23, 10:58 clock

It just occurred to me that the mantras put the molecules in a kind of position that represents the key to the cosmos or Akasha, of course that also depends on the key.

I know from the Vedas that the pronunciation of the mantras is fundamentally important, as is the timing, or more precisely the entire sound pattern. Many other rituals are also necessary, which can never actually be implemented by someone with bad intentions, because bad intentions change everything.

One can also imagine that when you are bad, your voice, gestures, facial expressions all manifest themselves accordingly. There are actors who can cover up a lot of things but look at how a lie detector works. Of course, there are also people who can outsmart man-made lie detectors.

Footnote

0 Imagine how the molecules dance, they need more space, like when it’s cold and everyone is huddled together to keep warm. No, we don’t want to attribute consciousness to the atoms, or do we 🤭?

1 Imagine you discover a floppy disk that is 2000 years old and you no longer know how the data was stored back then or how to interpret this binary code. Maybe there is no absolute coding mechanism or there are self-destruct mechanisms, maybe something similar to James Bond, where after you have read the message the message destroys itself or if unauthorized persons try to read the message and it then explodes. That is the difference between real and Maya, both go hand in hand.

Modern vs. Conservative

Modern vs. Conservative

It is incomprehensible to the uncultured, who probably consider themselves to be modern, let alone to the UNWORTHY.

Of course, the generations before cannot change their lives up to the present hour, so the past cannot be changed, but how it should be should be clear to everyone. This and only this allows a certain future to be possible for the worthy and those who want to be so, as long as they remain pure to the end: “The future must be earned“, but in such a way that there will never be any beneficiaries/parasite, that is, before there are beneficiaries, everyone would lose the future.

Even if parts of science believe that travel into the past or future is possible, that is nonsense. I can explain certain phenomena that have been identified differently, namely that the seed that has been planted constructs a parallel probability space from which something emerges and is projected onto the real axis, in combination with shifts in perception, which also comes about through the different reference systems, similar to Albert Einstein’s theory of relativity.

Do you actually know what the word modern actually means, as opposed to conservative?

Does the word “modern” say anything about the quality or quantity of the referenced construct/system? No, that would be nonsense. Look at the cars that are produced today and many other things, they are of inferior quality and that is intentional, it is called obsolescence. It does not necessarily have to be inferior quality across the board, but certain predetermined breaking points are deliberately added or inferior quality is used in certain places, I have noticed this in various things, e.g. in the vacuum cleaner. Of course, I know the business reasons, but that is another topic.

Modernity stands for change, that can be good or bad, so it can also be evil, in contrast to the conservative, that is unchangeable, if you compare it to a diamond, it even takes on a positive meaning, right?

Do you even know that the Trishula of Adi-Shakti is slightly slanted (11 o’clock position) in contrast to the Trishula of Shiva (12 o’clock position)? Do you also know why?

The female is always slanted, didn’t you know that 😂🤪? The interesting thing is that the son can come after the mother and the daughter can come after the father, so crossed, this is also how healthy reproduction is in the natural case, i.e. in cosmic or divine cases. From this context you will understand why absolute asymmetry is elementary, is indispensable, especially in today’s times (Doomsday 🌗), so that a certain symmetry arises.

Change means asymmetry, only through asymmetry are changes possible, symmetry means that they are equal, e.g. 4+1 = 5, in contrast to an inequality, which is 5 < 8. The word inequality also sounds very scary, don’t you think? Imagine there is no change, then there is no possibility of improvement, but if the asymmetry is too great, then it ends in catastrophe.

Did you know that there is a theory called the “butterfly effect” which uses an analogy to explain that the flapping of a butterfly’s wings in the Sahara causes a hurricane on the other side of the world?

What this analogy tries to describe is that small changes in the starting parameters have a big impact on the end result.

Do you also know where this gentleman behaviour comes from or the bad boy behaviour?

For example, put a dog in the middle of the road and say: “Don’t move”, what would happen if the dog didn’t move because it had to listen to the command, was conditioned to do so or is in the dog’s nature and a car came racing towards it, in contrast to a cat, which has a mind of its own anyway and doesn’t let anyone tell it what to do.

Maybe you understand a lot of things better now 🤭😇. The female wants change, the male on the other hand wants to keep in step, like the soldiers, in contrast the male wants to conquer, this is thanks to the Guna Rajas. The men are physically strong, the women are mentally strong (e.g. feeling pain, think of pregnancy), this also comes about because of this, this is Purusha, i.e. software, which represents the mind or the father and physical dominance, this is Prakriti, symbolizes Adi-Shakti.

Another analogy of the divine feminine and the divine masculine manifest differently in nature, namely gas needs a vessel so that it is no longer volatile, a vessel represents matter or Prakriti, of course a gas is also matter, this is all complicated to understand and actually cannot be separated, in fact very complex.

In true love there is no separation either, it is the ego, the darkness that separates you, I wear the breeches and not you, as if the right hand is arguing with the left, although it is natural that one hand is a little stronger, but both are irreplaceable and complement each other.

Ask the bodybuilders whether they value the fact that both halves of the body are trained symmetrically, why do you arrogant people think that your better half should be inferior? You notice it in aesthetics, but it gets lost in marriage, right?

You all create the problems yourself, perhaps boredom or stupidity or a combination of both, then there is also the INVISIBLE, where GASLIGHTING is practiced?

Remember, entering into a relationship with the wrong asymmetry is like stealing someone else’s asymmetry. This has serious consequences, especially in the current time, because it also determines the future. Of course, nothing can be wasted or used up, whether it’s a man or a woman. The uncultured will find this difficult to understand, it is also in their nature, because the law of inertia is also a manifestation of the unchangeable, namely Shiva.

Something else elementary, pathological jealousy etc. are also crystallizations of the broken asymmetries, I was able to experience this cosmically a few years ago, but it is very complicated to formulate here. I have recorded it in one of my audio protocols2024-04-28 17.30.05 (Protocol & Enlightenment – How jealousy arises → wrong partners or asymmetry break …)“.

The break can occur on many levels and dimensions, including parents, friends, the profession or divine calling, all of this and much more are part of the absolute asymmetry.

This question was induced by an unworthy person …

The year in which the idea of ​​absolute asymmetry arose must have been around 2003, plus or minus a year, although I got most of the inspiration when I was sitting in math lectures, and I also got many other ideas about artificial intelligence or the solution or defusing of the halting problem in a math lecture, although my fully formulated article on GG-Art18 is not yet complete. The thoughts are very complex, when I start to formulate them, a lot of them disappear, sometimes as if someone was deliberately erasing them with a kind of quantum eraser1, and it was also because of this disappearance of the thoughts that I had the idea, I think about 22 years ago, of developing an AI that would transcribe my thoughts into words 🤣😂.

https://gg-art18.dhivyah.com/de/widerspruch-im-halteproblems-entschaerfen/

[I published this article in 2016, but the fully formulated idea behind it is at least 10 years older.]

My thought was that artificial intelligence, actually it was Alan Turing who didn’t say that it was artificial intelligence because the term was only introduced later, but it was a universal program, but the way such a program works is similar to artificial intelligence, now back to defusing the problem, namely I have eliminated the paradox here in the same way that Barber’s paradox was eliminated.

My approach is that an artificial intelligence can be very powerful, even more powerful than humans on various levels of intellect, even if the machine lacks this one single gift of reflecting on itself, because humans are also only able to do this to a limited extent.

These are all just thought experiments because I have always been annoyed by how many professors just repeat what is in the books without thinking about what they are saying. I mean, I would even say that most academics have no idea what science really is.

I am passionate about topics from computer science, physics, psychology, parts of medicine in connection with artificial intelligence, etc., so in an interdisciplinary way, which is also necessary for topics like artificial intelligence, and I only have a problem with ignorance.

Important message

Last-But-Not-Least: Never think you are anonymous in the divine network, there is the divine karma system, this is untouchable, otherwise the cosmos would collapse, like the last 84 years before the Big Bang, then there is the man-made pseudo-karma system. So that you can see the numbers 84 and 85 in a cosmic context, whereby the numbers are coded in multiple dimensions. The collapse of the cosmos and the uncontrolled new beginning can be compared to a boot loop after a blue screen.

Do you know how old the current universe is according to the official scientific sources? It is around 13.81 billion years, according to Wikipedia. Put your human life or your existence in relation to it, then you will see how tiny you all are or insignificant, but the sum of your actions … not just in the last billion years.

Another important thing: Not all divine systems are constantly synchronized. This can be due to latency or they can be divinely formed. If you are together with the wrong asymmetries, even if only illusory, then divine structures will still be built for your wrong asymmetries and you, and destroyed when you separate, because everyone is also Shiva and Adi-Shakti somewhere, just on a small scale, so not congruent (definition: geometry). Only absolute purity on all levels and dimensions allows one to grow, where the ego then disappears, then one speaks of being enlightened, where there is no difference between Atman and Paramatman. This is also why Hindus talk about incarnations, even when it comes to human personalities, because they are worthy of God, but 0.000000009 ≠ 0, so not the same, they are messengers of God or his pearls, perhaps all the others were too. It is a kind of limit formation.

If you throw the question back to incarnations like Krishna, Rama, …, then contradictions arise, because where true love reigns, there are no such thought constructs. Such thoughts arise from impurities, which are also darkness or ignorance, and above all arrogance. What are the consequences? Do you think that it affects a snail who is the Chancellor or Vice Chancellor? Perhaps only indirectly.

Why is there an upper limit, e.g. the speed of light?

Imagine that the entire cosmos would have been destroyed by the beheading of Vinayagar or the suicide of Sati, which is also the case somewhere, it is called Dosha, similar to when the motherboard of a computer has cold solder joints or the circuit boards of the motherboard, which is also the cosmos, have been damaged with a sharp object.

Footnote

1 I do not use this term to coincide with the definition from quantum mechanics, but the mechanisms may be similar to those of a person suffering from anterograde amnesia, whereby the time intervals can be even shorter and manual intervention is also possible.

It is just that two or three years ago, when I was dealing with this topic from quantum physics, I was looking for a word for this matter at the same time, although according to my cosmic insight the theory in quantum physics should not be as correct as perhaps perceived or recorded by physicists.

Cosmos is alive and not dynamic and lifeless

Cosmos is alive and not dynamic and lifeless

When I use examples from computer science or many theories in physics/quantum physics and many other scientific domains that may attempt to describe consciousness, I get the feeling that many people have the wrong picture of the whole, namely that the cosmos is a kind of machine. The human body is also called a machine (இயந்திரம்/எந்திரம் → Enthiram) in Tamil, at least this is used in some Hindu texts, I think also that was the case in the Gita. You have to understand what the word machine actually suggests, namely first and foremost a certain degree of determinism, e.g. cigarette machines are deterministic, this is a topic in the basic course of computer science, how automata work, for example. 

Only because I use technical terms that humanity only came to understand in lifeless matter and even in the western hemisphere there is a kind of blindness when it comes to defining materials, because chemistry also has certain definitions between dead matter and living matter etc.

I have been able to observe and perceive a lot of things in recent years, which then convinced me a lot and or I didn’t know how to sort it all out or understand it. There is also a song by Xavier Naidoo that sums it up, namely “Alles Lebt [→ Everything is alive]” or you won’t believe it, similar to the Disney film “Beauty and the Beast“.

Just for your information, I don’t know to what extent who/what has already experienced everything that is constantly being passed on in circles, not only that, but new groups are gradually joining in, so don’t draw the wrong conclusions, I haven’t taken drugs and I don’t take drugs either, maybe a little alcohol, that’s only for medical purposes, i.e. digestion 🤭.

Why I mention this, but phrase it a bit funny, is to remember that your thoughts are also actions, just as your non-thoughts are also an action, similar to how the empty set is also a subset of every set.

It’s not just that it’s mentioned here, but that’s how it’s presented in Hinduism. There are two major movements in Hinduism, Vedanta and Samkhya, although I couldn’t delve into the kind of philosophical works that I would have if I had studied philosophy because I couldn’t find a teacher or people who were passionate about it, and I even wanted to learn and understand Sanskrit, so I can’t categorize it that way, but I was able to teach myself a lot from the context of the Vaishnava tradition. Of course, there are many ways to teach all of this nowadays, e.g. via YouTube, which wasn’t the case when I was spiritually blossoming and only played a major role in my autodidactic progress in the later phase. Now it’s too late for a lot of things or more preciously not more needed because the entire library is inside me 😇, as Hinduism also says, you just have to find the access 🤭, regardless of the fact that I don’t…

There’s a difference between reading all of that or having read it like I did and perhaps not having understood it, but then suddenly experiencing/perceiving everything and no longer knowing how to sort out this perception, especially all of that overstimulated my senses, as I have already described figuratively with the blind man who begins to see for the first time. It’s just that no one is currently able to talk openly about it because there are different construction sites or legacy issues everywhere.

I experienced all of that in the first phase, which was before 2012 à la Enemy of the State 🤭, but even then, not everyone was willing to talk, even though I did.

My hypothesis is that due to the different latencies, people are not aware of many things, and perhaps other things cannot be conscious of them, even if they are conscious. Can you follow me? In abstract terms, how do you think a snail perceives time if it could do something like that, which humans or science cannot rule out? It certainly has a completely different time lapse, similar to the frame rate in a video, than humans, right?

I have read that intoxicated people, i.e. those who take drugs, also have different time lapses, i.e. perception of time. This is also shown in films, as if their consciousness receives and processes more information in the same period of time. I know that the brain has a natural filter that protects against overstimulation, for example if you live on a busy street, at some point you no longer notice these background noises, it is a natural filtering mechanism of the brain, also a kind of shutter-function or firewall.

It is also, what is perception here, how is it to be understood, are there other sense organs than the 5 (+4) senses defined in science?

Is it possible that certain perceptions can be activated somehow, as if by an (invisible) switch? Some things also reminded me of one of my first posts, namely the transcendent of the number 3, where Hinduism defines three levels or states, namely:

  1. அரூபம் (Transliteration: Aruhpam), 
  2. அருவுருவம் (Transliteration: Aruvuruvam) and 
  3. உருவம் (Transliteration: Uruvam)

Some things in physics, namely dark matter or dark energy, or the interactions, although I had a different explanation for the first two, that’s another matter, but in order to better understand the sensory perception, you have to understand what an interaction is in physics. 

Most of the time physics is only about one interaction, namely electromagnetism, and the 5+4 can also be traced back to that, because the sense of sight, what happens here is that the visible light, which is actually electromagnetism, i.e. a certain frequency spectrum, is converted into electrical signals, which is also electromagnetism, i.e. electricity. This is transmitted via the optic nerves to the visual cortex in the back of the head.

It’s similar with everything else, e.g. the sense of smell, here the chemical substances are converted into electrical impulses and in turn are transmitted electrically, as if via a kind of data line, which are the nerves or the entire CNS, to the relevant area of ​​the brain. It is no different with the sense of hearing. There, the acoustic stimuli are converted into electrical impulses by the fine hairs and membrane in the ear, perhaps similar to a record, and then transmitted electrochemically; actually, all stimuli are transmitted electrochemically.

How can you imagine the interaction in abstract terms, what does interaction mean? In layman’s terms or in a visual representation, an interaction is like when two billiard balls hit each other. What happens when two billiard balls hit each other? They learn about each other, or if they had consciousness. This is only explained in layman’s terms or as a model, so that you understand what an interaction is, because otherwise the physicists might have a fit of rage 🤭.

For human perception, and perhaps even sufficient for survival, it is clear that when two billiard balls collide, these two objects interact. However, in the quantum world this is not the case. There, there is the phenomenon of wave-particle duality and there are mediating particles that exchange the message or the forces. In electromagnetism, these are photons.

Further sources