We rattle and shake science
What is man or…?
Speaking of science, does the word “science” come from “creating knowledge”? What do the etymological lexicons say about this? The Kluge etymological dictionary of the German language, for example, says on page 994: (14th century) “Collective formation of the infinitive Middle High German ‘wizzen’; …”, I have my own explanation, namely “creating knowledge”.
What is a human being, have you ever asked the question? I’m not concerned with the biological question here, i.e. the biological definition or the definition from a medical perspective? Please don’t forget that even in medicine in different countries there are different definitions of when someone is declared dead, namely with predefined time intervals. Here in Germany, two independent doctors have to certify that a person has died. In the United States, things are different.
To provocatively confuse the matter, i.e. your mind, a little more, remember that the way I sometimes proceed is similar to determining limits, i.e. performing operations that are forbidden, such as dividing by zero or performing arithmetic operations with infinity.
I have already talked about science, that it is also a kind of new religion, this is a provocative method, one has to shake the foundations to see whether it is built on air. Ask the chemists, although this is one of the areas in which I am not particularly well-versed, but I can still understand a lot through physics. It is similar with biology for me, but I can still contradict certain things that are familiar to the general public. That has to do with rational thinking. What am I trying to address here, e.g. that the models in chemistry that an electron orbits the atomic nucleus, like the planets orbit the sun, are not given as they are depicted, regardless of the fact that the model visualization that an electron is a particle does not even exist or could not be observed.
How else do you arrive at the particle-wave dualistic world view? I am not concerned with such abstract things, but with things that you might be interested in, such as what you are.
I also noticed through observations a year ago that DNA cannot necessarily be used as software to build the body as an explanation, but that it is a kind of framework. That is my interpretation or description, because I have also followed the issue of CRISPR technology and many other things and of course above all the observations of the last few years since 2010, where I have immersed myself in new things, where this is hidden from the general public or has been ensured. I am talking about the framework, as it is also known in the SW. It is also the case that certain invisible energies/currents/messengers 🤭… ensure that certain switches can be turned on and/or off, whether this is hair loss or grey hair, of course this can also have other reasons.
I happened to hear a similar explanation from a renowned biologist just two weeks ago, and I was astonished.
It is also the case that according to official science, all human cells are completely renewed every few years, so every cell in your body is new. You just don’t notice it. The aging process occurs because errors occur during copying, but these do not have to be.
How else do you arrive at the particle wave dualistic world view? I’m not concerned with such abstract things, but with things that you might be interested in, such as what you are.
Let’s think about it: people have feelings, i.e. emotions, people have a body, mind, Atman (soul), consciousness, Manas – at least these entities strike me, although Western culture might not know certain terms here, just because you don’t know something doesn’t mean that it doesn’t exist.
Here is an excerpt from Mahabharata (Episode 209, Star Vijay):
I wrote down this entire episode 209 a year or two ago and also in all 3 languages (TA → EN & DE). This document consists of 22 pages, which would be too much of a good thing here 🤭.
Timestamp → 02 min:18 sec
இல்லை பார்த்தா. அந்த கூற்று சத்தியமானால், ஏன் மரணத்துக்கு பின்பு அந்த தேகம் அழிந்து விடுகிறது? உண்மை யாதெனில், ஒரு மனிதன் அறியப்படுவதும் தேகத்தால் அல்ல, அதன் சம்பந்தங்களும் ஆதாரமும் தேகத்தை கொண்டது அல்ல.
மனிதனுடைய சுபாவம், அவனுடைய நடத்தை, அவன் ஆற்றும் செயலே அவனது பரீட்சையம்.
இந்த சுபாவம், நடத்தை மற்றும் செயல்கள் எவ்வாறு உருவாகின்றன, அதை குறித்து ஆலோசி.
மானிட வாழ்வு என்பது கண்ணுக்கு புலப்படுகின்ற, புலப்படாத 20 பண்புகளோடு தொடர்புடையது.
இருப்பினும் பார்த்தனே, ஒவ்வொரு மனிதனின் சுபாவமும் காரியங்களும், மாறுபட்டு வேறுபட்டு விளங்குகின்றன. அதற்கு காரணமானவை இந்த சிருஷ்டியில் மூன்று குணங்கள்: தமஷ், ரஜஷ் அத்துடன் சத்வம்.
No, my friend. If your statement were true, then why does this body perish after death? The truth is, a person is not identified by their body (think of transplants of body parts e.g. hand, leg, heart, eyes…who owns it after the transplant…), nor are their relationships and identity traced back to their body.
A man’s character, behaviour and actions are his touchstone.
Think about the basis on which a person’s character, behaviour and actions develop.
Human life is associated with 20 visible and invisible qualities/virtues.
But, my friend, all man’s actions and his manner of actions are different, aren’t they? This is due to the three Gunas: Tamas, Rajas and Sattva.
Apparently, there are also people, these are called psychopaths, who have no access to their emotions. They can pretend a lot that they have emotions, but they cannot understand it.
What is it like when one of these entities is missing [02/2020], for example, similar to how in biology a child is born without arms or with an extra head, i.e. Siamese twins, what is this called in biology? These are things that are visible (for current science), but what about the things that have not been understood, similar to how you cannot see air, i.e. oxygen, but their existence can be indirectly proven?
There are also parents who know full well that if they give birth to children, there is a high probability that they will be born with physical and/or mental disabilities, but they still give birth. You can call it love or even ignorance, of course it is mostly selfishly motivated. What if this child is a burden on the collective because things have not yet been understood as they should have been? Who is responsible, purely hypothetically? We also want to use the concept of doomsday. The child has already fallen into the well, so the only option left is: “Get well and go to hell”, right? Of course, there are alternatives, e.g. sweeping it under the carpet, e.g. some parents do this when a child doesn’t like something, they slip something to the child without asking, without them noticing. That may be true, I always say that every child, every life or individual is a science in itself that takes time and energy.
Medical science talks about perception disorders, and it is also clearly defined according to the ICD or DSM, but what really is perception disorders, especially when certain truths are withheld in official science or from humanity in general?
Can you imagine consciousness as a single consciousness, where each individual is assigned an address range in the infinite RAM, that is the main memory or random-access memory, similar to how the computer assigns an address range for each program, this is also the case when programs are programmed to be error-prone, hackers use this, for example, to crash the program through buffer-overflow, maybe even the entire operating system. For those not technically savvy, the buffer-overflow is comparable to when you leave your things at the neighbour’s house but look for them in your own or accuse the neighbour of something 🤭🔥.
If anyone thinks that this is too far from reality, there are many renowned physicists and other scientists who postulate such approaches. Please also do not forget that the gravitational waves that Albert Einstein announced about 100 years ago were only discovered in the last few years (mid-2014) in the data streams of the Laser Interferometer Gravitational-Wave Observatory, or LIGO for short, at least that is what science tells the masses, also proclaimed as mainstream science.
While we are already proclaiming science as a kind of new religion, have you all noticed that for many people, for example, football clubs, musicians, politicians, etc. are like gods? How does something like that come about? Is something being kept secret that makes all of this crystallize like this?
I know from my own experience, because many of my boys are very football fanatics, although I am a complete zero, that despite being friends they sometimes get into arguments as if this was about some kind of deity.
You also know from the media how girls scream around all the singers or band members as if they are worthy of worship, some kind of deity or demigod?
What is all this? Of course, you can find terms for all of these in psychology, but I question everything where gaslighting is practiced. If you have to read between the lines in science because you are afraid to tell the truth, then there is something wrong with your system/society, right?
Another important thing, perhaps one or the other has noticed how the world is structured, politically and/or economically. It is also the case that when you separate certain things, a lot of things develop in a bulge-like or cancer-like manner, because all of this was designed for a kind of form of the world that is unified and not so fragmented.
What do I mean by that? There are certain customs and traditions in different cultures that have perhaps crystallized, whether something has arisen from matriarchal or patriarchal customs does not necessarily correspond to the divine order, similar to cancerous tumours, all of which are consequences of the Doshas. No one would come up with the idea of classifying cancerous tumours, whether good or bad, as normal, right?
Did you know that after Sati’s suicide, humanity was like half-orphans? Why perhaps certain children do not respect their mothers because they let themselves down? In the Ramayana it was even the other way around, namely that Rama’s children did not want to accept their father and even took their mother’s name as their surname/family name/last name, at least that is how it is portrayed in one of the film adaptations, without going into the truth of this here, i.e. whether this corresponds to the official sources or a product of the imagination.
Did you know that in the animal kingdom there are creatures that are monogamous? Of course, there are also animals that prove the opposite, where do all these things come from, even in humanity? According to some sources, there is also behaviour in the animal kingdom where male species are killed by the female after sexual intercourse?
It is also the case that when different cultures collide, bad behaviour is usually adopted. I explained this to a former friend about 28 years ago. Is this also what is meant in the famous book “Clash of Civilizations” by Samuel P. Huntington, which I have not yet read in its entirety?
Everything in nature interacts, that is also one of my cosmic views that revealed this to me.
In physics, the interactions are clearly defined, namely the four fundamental forces: strong interaction, weak interaction, electromagnetism and gravity. Apparently, there is also a fifth force, which brings us back to the number FIVE.
But back to my question, what about nature? If you castrate certain truths, another word for gaslighting, do you then find the truth, or is it difficult? Apparently, there was a time when it was punished if you said that the earth was a sphere. More recent sources say that this was character assassination, but that is what was mostly claimed in various official sources.
Last but not least: It should be clear that I write most articles in about 30 minutes, which means I will not be able or willing to invest much time to make it meet scientific standards.
I am not writing this for the scientific audience because they already know what to look for, but for the common people so that they can be picked up. Of course, it is also about me observing everything to form judgements about humanity and everything else. How the information is carried to you, even if the real readership is small, maybe the wind (air), one of the Pancha Boothas will carry the message to you in your ears 🤭.