Daily Archives: 21. November 2024

Reductio ad absurdum – Why can’t one divide by 0?

Reductio ad absurdum – Why can’t one divide by 0?

If $$E=mc^2$$, i.e. there were a number like this, you could find out by transforming → , which cannot be the case.

There is no number a, such that when multiplied by 0 the result is 1. The assumption that  would have a result a, leads to a contradiction!

In mathematics, this procedure is called a mathematical proof. This particular one is a reductio ad absurdum (“reduction to absurdity”).

Only the present is absolute

Only the present is absolute real

EN: Lightspeed, duration of light from sun to earth (Only the present is absolute)

DE: Lichtgeschwindigkeit, Lichtdauer von der Sonne zur Erde (Nur die Gegenwart ist absolut)

Lightspeed, duration of light from sun to earth (Only the present is absolute)

Please always remember that the past cannot be changed and no one can change it. This would break the rules of this cosmos [Sanātana Dharma – SD], the cosmos of purity and subtlety, the future must first be born, and therefore must be earned, being born can also be translated into reality, in other words, you must plant fertile seeds. None of you knows whether the day will come tomorrow, not even whether the earth will set in the next few minutes, because if the sun were to suddenly go out, the earth would only find out about 8 minutes later that someone had turned off the light, regardless of the further impact of the suddenly occurring vacuum, i.e. gravitational or that of the catapult. Regardless of the type of disappearance, the end takes on different forms of the apocalypse.

From these circumstances, the only possibility arises that only now can truly exist, even if this span/moment is infinitesimally small but that is a separate topic. These are your decisions, actions and everything that goes with it. Only this is true.

 

From Myths to Truth – Part 1

From Myths to Truth Part 1

If one understands to some extent that free will is more of an illusion than a reality, then perhaps science can also accept that there must be such a thing as fate, unless it still tries to deny it à la gaslighting, and this for capitalist and similar reasons, perhaps even out of embarrassment. Do you know what gaslighting is?

If fate exists, then there could also be karma, a system with memory and rules, based on the cause and effect principle. If one recognizes this, then one also recognizes the creator, that there must be a creator, perhaps even dualistic at first glance.

If all of this has been recognized, then one can also recognize that the creator and creatoress can also become flesh, i.e. can incarnate/manifest, even if this shows or brings with it certain limitations at the beginning. It is arrogance, another form of ignorance, that puts a stop to this, like a shutter that is drawn down and darkens the interior. Why are there shutters or why do your houses have shutters or similar structures?

Do you have to go through all these steps? Are there students under or do you know of ones who are so talented that they skip several grades?

Another thing, in Hinduism the Devi, the cosmic mother, is the one who creates the Mayas (illusions), for example just as the mother tells fairy tales, i.e. illusions so that the child eats, but the cosmic father is the destroyer of these illusions, and his voice becomes angry and loud when someone tries to drown in the seas of Maya.

Also remember that this absolute dualism mixes, like every man has male and female hormones.

Deciphering nature, please don’t come with your arrogance:

Why does man also consist of the female chromosome, i.e. X and Y?

Of course, he is the product of his parents, who are male and female, but the basis is the cosmic mother – she is the fine one, that is also the purity, and why purity is so fundamentally important. If the basis is right, then even a strong hurricane cannot harm it, on different levels. If the basis is not right, think about the cellular level. What are tumours or physical and mental disabilities? Is the basis right here? Do only women have to be pure? No, is the answer! Both have to be pure, but it is a very long journey to understand this, where everything is already starting to crumble apart, so time is in short supply.

The father forms the basis of the mind, that is the operating system or the software of the human being. In Hinduism it is called Purusha, and the mother is the hardware, i.e. Prakriti. Of course, these are only model explanations of a complex system and it is so interwoven that you cannot distinguish or separate it. If you try to separate it anyway, everything will split. Imagine that your sweater is knitted from two different types of wool, one black and one white. What happens if you try to separate the individual threads? For example: I don’t want the black one anymore and you can’t dye it? Do you still have that sweater? The ignorant will say, then we’ll knit it according to our ideas, the problem is, you are in a boat that you are currently dismantling, where there is only the inside, the outside is not defined. Remember, you can only find and invent something if it is there, even in the world of thought, as I recently said.

Now you can ask, where does the diabolical come from, popularly known as devilish?

Do you know what Dosha (தோசம்) is? It means error, perhaps like in the movie “The Matrix”, i.e. error in the matrix 😇?

Last but not least: You should not forget that the daughter can take after the father and the son like the mother, you know that from everyday life. A lot of things cross over on different levels, on the software basis, just as on the hardware basis.

So that the individual does not sink into the seas of Maya or get caught in its net and cause even more harm, death is salvation or a blessing. This is the philosophical concept of Hinduism, which is made clear by Shiva (represented by the number 5).

Order: Part 5

Order: Part 5

Can anyone explain the well-known quote, at least it is often quoted by religious people in Western culture or Christianity in the context of marriage:

“A marriage is decided in heaven and fulfilled on earth.”

Perhaps this can be compared and understood with the absolute asymmetry of love. Real seeds have already been planted in various cultures, only they have not been planted on really fertile ground and have taken on more satanic traits. That, in turn, is a topic in itself.

If there is an order in nature, don’t you think that everything is well sorted and is just thrown together as a kind of job creation scheme. If you understand the mechanisms of this throwing together, you can do a lot of damage, similar to how if you know the laws of planetary movement, then you can predict planetary movements using Kepler’s law, that’s no longer hocus-pocus, is it? The problem is that stupidity knows no limits, but intellect does. 

One more thing: I also want to counteract the ignorance of many who perhaps think that it is their impulse that makes them speak or write. To do this, you have to understand something from Hinduism that is worshipped as a deity in the form of an elephant. This deity has many names, including a Tamil name, namely Vinayagar (விநாயகர்), which means the one who brings questions (விநா = question) to life in everyone. Most people associate turmeric colour with this deity. 

One more thing that is wrong is that Hinduism is a polytheistic religion, it is not necessarily pluralistic, as some educated people try to define it, but perhaps dualistic at first glance, that is Shiva and Adi-Shakti.

At some point, if humanity still exists, it will understand that all religions are not different, they just come from the same source, but identifying them seems to be difficult for some because the ego gets in the way. The ego is nothing more than ignorance or having a really thick callus where you hardly feel anything. You can also compare it to a firewall, a rule that is activated and throws away the packets, if you try to look at it more in the context of the shutterfunction

Last but not least: Has it ever happened to you in your life that you said things in an argument and then you thought, I didn’t actually want to say that? The matter then somehow escalated and you no longer had control 😈👿 over your tongue… I do! What about your motor skills?

Order: Part 4

Order: Part 4

It is perhaps not known to the general public that there is a clear image for something abstract in mathematics, namely the visualization of the probability space.

If one put a chimpanzee in front of a typewriter and give the chimpanzee enough time, paper, ink, etc., it is possible that the chimpanzee will one day type out the entire Bible without making any mistakes.

This possibility exists in this universe. This is called the possibility space. With this I want to reinforce my previous statement that you can only invent something that is also an element of the possibility space, without analysing again the German word “erfinden“, i.e. “to invent” etymologically.

So, if a chimpanzee can even type the Bible correctly, isn’t it the arrogance of humans that they put themselves on a pedestal?

You also have to understand chance correctly, not necessarily as quantum mechanics postulated or the interpretation of it, but in all contexts or the true nature, i.e. without castrating anything.

Apparently, it was, at least that is the official statement 😉, I had other impressions, but that is another matter, to unite quantum mechanics with the theory of relativity and create an all-encompassing super theory, that is TOE (Theory of Everything). There are many different approaches to trying to make this happen, including quantum gravity. 

I presented this for the first time on my website about 18 years ago or so, which then led to some professors (Uni HD, HHN …) degrading fellow students, but that is an old story.

Actually, it was not this that fueled their arrogance, but the fact that I criticized string theory or saw it as more suitable for science fiction films and not as a model of reality, at least the general interpretation. I considered the idea that space could be rolled up like strings to be unrealistic, but I did not expect that people of this calibre might be interested in my lecture. It was more of a desperate attempt on my part to find like-minded people, but not necessarily to generate hostility.

I also did not expect that professors or others in this country would have the upper hand, because this was not known in my mind at the time.

In the meantime, I had impressions/visions about the reality of physics, i.e. about the model of the world, where the 3+1 (=4) dimension, known in science as space-time, is not sufficient to describe many phenomena, such as gut feeling, remote viewing (RV) and many other phenomena, but there are additional dimensions or entities that exist on each of the four axes and twice, i.e. MahaKala and MahaKali.

By the way, if you are interested in the sets above the complex numbers, here is the resolution of the hierarchy: Quaternion, Octonion, Sedenion

All of these have several imaginary axes. These also play a role in string theory or 3D games, (3D) simulations up to my mentions, such as: RV, consciousness etc.