Monthly Archives: July 2016

The transcendent of the number three

The transcendent of the number three

[Last Update: 04.01.2017]

Three stages or three states of the divine are described in Hinduism in the following way:

அரூபம் (Transliteration: Aruhpam)

Arupam is the transcendental “form” of the divine. Actually the word/term “form” is contradictory to that what is being described here.

Another way to describe: Arupam describes a state of formless existence of the divine. Here the word “existence” is disturbing. It describes a state in our physical world but this form is apart from our world.

  • dimensionless, formless = no space
    → similar to the state before Big Bang
  • timeless = time does not exist [?]
    [→ similar to the state before Big Bang]

→ apart from space and time:
It should be clear to everyone that time, matter, space etc. arose with the Big Bang.

[Sanskrit]:
Yato vaco nivartante 
aprapya manasa saha 

Translation: 
This is the state where the power of the natural language is insufficient to describe it and our mind is not able to conceive it.

Source: Yajur Vedha & Taittiriya-Upanishads: 4.1.1 + 4.1.2

அருவுருவம் (Transliteration: Aruvuruvam)

This is a form more precisely a state which is neither Aruhpam (formless) nor Uruvam (form-bound). This is a transitional form.

[Sanskrit]:
Na asat aseet 
na sat aseet tandanim

Rough translation: 
It is neither existent nor non-existent.

Source: Rig Vedha

உருவம் (Transliteration: Uruvam)

Uruvam describes the state when God takes a form to show mankind the way. This is called Avatara (அவதார) or incarnation. The word Avatar, which exists in our modern time/world, is a variation/modification of the word Avatara.

Summary

One can refer the three stages of the divine also to the universe. These stages are also consistent with the Big Bang theory.

The model of truth

The model of truth

[Last update: 18th July 2017]

Many understand under the model of truth only the two common defintions of truth. One is the truth and the other one is the untruth or the non-truth. The classical mathematical proof is based on this dualistic principle. There is a similar model in mathematics, called fuzzy logic, but that is not what I mean.

[Attention: The understanding of truth takes different dimensions in quantum physics, see Heisenberg’s uncertainty principle and the thought experiment “Schrödinger’s cat“]

Can our world be described purely by the classic model so far, or must we extend or complement this model? What if this model is not even enough for our classical view. Can truth be at the same time true and false, or never meet the criteria of the other two?

In philosophy, we discover a truth model that has three faces, or, as the physicists or mathematicians would formulate, consist of three states. The absolute truth, the non-truth, and the third is the “relative (suggested or subjective) truth”. The latter is the truth which an individual perceives as true, but which does not correspond to the absolute truth. Absolute truth is always true in any view and state, regardless of perspective, and there is no truth above it.

This philosophical construct is not only of a platonic nature! The special theory of relativity also makes use of this definition (question of perspective or frame of reference) without mentioning this.

  • (Absolute) truth, it is true in every context or in all areas. (There is no truth above it)
  • The non-truth, it is wrong in every context or in all areas
  • The relative truth, it is true or false only from a certain context
    • The relative truth should be well defined in philosophy, politics and similar disciplines in order to explain occurrences and actions better:
      • suggested truth:
        The truth which is held to be true
      • subjective truth:
        The truth which one or more individuals consider/think to be true, as it is suggested by external sources or it is perspective

The terms and their definitions, as I have defined them here, is important in order to be able to judge and understand things differently. The mind must be sensitized and properly trained for this task.

Many do not know that journalism is the unofficial fourth pillar of a democratic legal system. In this context, I would like to introduce a person / journalist, whom I humanly as well as intellectually admire – that is no other than Peter Scholl-Latour. His reports and his knowledge are legendary. Sometimes even for such a person it is not, or hardly possible, to present the absolute truth, as I have defined it here. Because even such personalities do not have the knowledge for example about all unofficial technologies to bring the absolute truth to light.

The proceeding of certain interest groups, as I have already described in my article “The oldest war weapon in the world,” is not only one-dimensional, it is multi-dimensional. Just to concentrate only on technologies and psychology is bad. There are other attack areas like the economy, personal life etc.

In addition, I recommend the following Wikipedia article to read:

But do not confuse this with my sentence “violation of causality”!

Footnote

* Helmut Schmidt and Peter Scholl-Latour at the talk show of Mr. Beckmann (Public broadcasting: → ARD) [Translated: Helmut Schmidt meets Peter Scholl-Latour, broadcasted on 2nd May 2011 on ARD]

I should also like to mention that Helmut Schmidt had through his work as a Federal Chancellor from 1974 to 1982 and from 1969 to 1972 through his work as Federal Minister of Defense, additional (intelligence agency) information or a different view of information as Peter Scholl- Latour. The old Chancellor already knew in those days about the activities of different secret services and the technologies used by them, which is first now known to the wider world population by the current reconnaissance. This can be seen clearly in the interview. Anyone who knows all the public appearances of the two admirable personalities can make a better picture from local politics to world politics. There are also many books about and by the two gentlemen.

For a better understanding, I would recommend the book Targeted Killing: The Future of the War by Armin Krishnan. This book is only in German language available. Unfortunately, there is also no printed version for this book, but the digital edition (Kindle Edition) is available by amazon. If you have an Amazon account and a tablet PC or smartphone, you can download the Kindle app to read the purchased book. You do not really need the Amazon in-house Kindle Reader. You can use every Android phone and iPhone, where this Kindle app can be installed. This app is also available as desktop software for the personal computer.

Knowledge, another form of power

Knowledge, another form of power

There is enough information on the Internet, but it is sometimes unsuitable for scientific purposes because the sources do not meet the standards of science. It is for everyone advisable to continue one’s education. I sometimes get the feeling that people are living the ideology that if one put a little effort on one’s brain it can be spared, as it may sometimes be the case with everyday things. This does not apply to our most important organ; the opposite is the case!

I would like to quote an old Tamil proverb for the end:

கற்றது கையளவு
கல்லாதது உலகளவு.

Translated it means, what you know has the dimension of a fist, compared to what you do not know, it is as big as the entire world / the universe.

Or even shorter:
What you know is the size of a fist – what you do not know is as big as the world / the universe.

Conclusion:

Only knowledge can protect everyone from that, what is currently happening all over the world. Hope that when the purification procedure is over, it will never be needed again for a yuga, or these downgrades of yugas will no longer be the case – except for one’s own karma, it is always enduring. For information, we are in Kali Yuga after the Hindu age.

By-the-way (btw):
Wissenschaft [→ science] = Wissen erschaffen [→ create knowledge]
Wissenschaft [→ science] ≠ Wissen begraben [→ burying knowledge]

I will give you a few sources here, how and where you can possibly get free electronic books, etc., then gradually expand them without getting this post to the foreground each time.

The links to the free eBooks pages as well as the online sources can be only found in the future here:

The world’s oldest war weapon

The world’s oldest war weapon

[Last Update: 03rd August 2017]

The oldest war weapon in the world is as old as the mankind, but still effective and timeless.

Many of us imagine when they hear the word “war weapon” something technical, perhaps in our new era of B2B, something with B2B. How can it work with and without B2B and what are the consequences? I’ll try to explain the classical way without technical achievements, so anybody understand this can imagine what will it be if the attacks are combined (e. g. see my post “The Amygdala – part of the limbic system: do we really decide?”).

There is a very powerful weapon – the oldest war weapon – it is not of a physical nature, it is of psychological nature. The damages/manipulations are on a level, that the detection of the source(s) or backtracking cannot be done fast enough or is impossible. One of the reasons why detecting is so difficult is, that they try to not violate the causality e. g. using the given situation like hate between races, religions, families etc. and lot of manipulation are going through more than one generation. One should also notice that the source / injector can’t be classified as nations or something like that. Sometimes the manipulation can also take unwanted positive side effects. There is not only one psychological attack tactic because the less number of psychological attack tactics would lead the chances of success converging to zero.

Imagine the fundament for the EU (European Union) was given shortly after the second world war and not first in the end of the 80s. One of the reasons to build the EU is to be armed for such manipulation. The reason why this point of view is first shortly understandable is that even not all were inaugurated. The form of the EU like we have now is given since the 21st century. The situation we have now and can feel and notice is the absolute truth (see my definition absolute truth or The three manifolds of truth, or the three faces of truth) and bring politics, sciences, religions etc. in a new absolute view. In those days, the fitting of the parameters of a complex equation were not so easy like nowadays with classical computers or quantum computers. The equation of the world politics is so complex as the equation for the weather. Apropos weather, the research for manipulating the weather started even before the First World War e. g. injecting the clouds with silver iodide and the information that a weather can decide about victory or defeat was known since the mankind are waging wars. Nowadays we can feed a computer with different parameters and let it calculate the end process.  This is the reason why some manipulations had positive or unwanted side effects in those days without powerful computers.

How can one divide religions, peoples, ethnic groups, cultures, families, etc.? Since the technical achievements alone are not sufficient, perhaps not useful, because one could identify the source / injector* and thereby the damage will be compensated after a foreseeable time.

The causers / fire raisers conceal themselves behind religions, ethnicities, nations, although they are everywhere and with us. The tactics are even better when they sometimes play the firefighters after they have raised up the fire. The hatred / hate in everyone is the driving force that the injectors usually use. Once lit, it develops its own dynamics (momentum), which was so intended by the injectors. One can then decouple from the thing, because the own dynamics will do the rest and one do not run the risk of being detected.

To conceal everything more effectively, keep the primitive people primitive and let them play/consume/deal with primitive things. This is only a tactical deflection maneuver. I am counting here some of the things: whorehouses, alcohols, drugs, etc. Combine these with financial hardship (e.g. less payments) bad education etc. and one will get a better effect of concealing.

If one combine all these things the system, the people, the nations, etc., are thrown into a controlled chaos. This information is also pointed out in my article “The glassy man, a devil’s work?” In the sentence: “If one have ever thought about how tailback / jam occurs and how engineers try to disarm these then you ‘ll understand how one can use the same Know-how to get the opposite effect.”

How can chaos be controllable – is not a contradiction?

It is important to question the events correctly, objectively and with rational mind and not to drown in any conspiracy theories. This would be counterproductive since it is poison for the mind. It is also bad at the same time to doubt everything or to believe, one come into vicious circle. One must accept certain things as true – unless the contrary is proved. This is similar to the mathematical proof. If one begins to doubt everything even the basic axioms of the mathematics, the whole system collapses. Anyone who has been good in maths, e. g. reductio ad absurdum, mathematical induction etc., will understand what I’m trying to explain.

* injector = people who injects things in classical way or with technical achievements

Similar and additional posts

Further sources

Power, an instrument with two faces

Power, an instrument with two faces

[Last Update: 31st October 2018]

Power can be interpreted as an instrument for the common good or as an instrument for the preservation of egocentric fire in one respectively i.e. the ego which seeks to preserve its own interests.

[It can sometimes make sense to be clear about terminology before going into depth. Because terminology sometimes can create space for interpretations that the author may or may not want to have. The associations which is not intended by the author can cause damage. This is for general and not only for this post]

The word power can be interpreted in different ways. One can equate power e.g. with money and wealth, knowledge can be power or the combination of this and that. It becomes dangerous with power, if it is the combination or the union of many or all, that the interests of one or a limited number of people of this world should serve. Here the instrument “power” misses the welfare of all, that is, the common good.

An interesting example from the current time is e.g. the Brexit topic or the elections in the United States of America. I can take more recent examples from (world) politics, but we will limit to these two issues, not to lose the track.

Was and will the people be sufficiently informed about the consequences of their decision? I am well aware that the complexity of (world) politics cannot be summed up in a few sentences – for that reason, the parties choose topics or election promises that can sometimes be polarizing, with which they attract their voters, although the topics later in the real politics may only be one of many or only a side topic. Also, the fact that the voters’ sympathy for a politician or a particular party or the combinations of this can blind the voter without his or her noticing.

Of course, the politicians know this and make use of it. This usage can, as suggested in my headline, come from two motives: the common good, or it should only serve a handful of people.

If I had to properly discuss the two topics, I would not come around without exposing an individual or a small group of individuals behind it – above all, I do not want it if I feel that the individual is unaware about the consequences of its action (Brexit).

The fact of the Brexit issue is that British law does not require or be binding on the vote, as this would limit the sovereignty of the parliament, which, however, must be guaranteed under British law – in simple words, one do not have to implement the vote, the parliament can also ignore it.

[A German proverb says: Whoever says “A” must also say “B” – I say that this does not necessarily have to be. This should be an allusion to my chosen topics that I do not really want to deepen, not out of laziness, but primarily out of didactic reasons]

Further sources about Brexit